Brief Essay on Toyota

June 17th, 2010 / No Comments » / by nastyrunner

Toyota is a leading Japanese automobile company, with sales operations carried out all five continents and with over 9 million cars sold in the year 2006. It also has itself listed within the top 10 companies according to the fortune 500 companies. (www.toyota.com)

Toyota first operations started in Denmark, and since then there has been no looking back for Toyota. From the year 1963 to 2006, Toyota has sold approximately 15 million vehicles and believes in the policy of localisation. This policy means that Toyota produces their automobiles within the area in which they are sold. Toyota believes that this policy will help better understanding the needs of different community groups.(www.toyotauk.com)



Green Supply Chain

June 17th, 2010 / 2 Comments » / by nastyrunner

Green Supply Chain

1.0 Description of Green Supply Chain
With the increasing change in the world environment and the global warming people have changed their views and interests in the products they buy. Consumers now are more concerned of the environmental changes and how they can go about in changing their habits. One of the main changes in the consumer habits are the products they buy. Consumers now look for products that are environmental friendly or in other words recyclable and energy saving. Therefore, companies now are looking to produce green. Here comes the idea of green supply chain.



Training and Development (Example of Emirates Airlines)

June 17th, 2010 / No Comments » / by nastyrunner

1.0. Introduction:-

Emirates is one of the fastest growing airline in the world amongst all the other international airlines even though it is one of the youngest airline flying the skies. Emirates airline was born just 20 years ago as an official airline which is an international airline of the UAE. Emirates started of in Dubai and flew out with only two aircrafts in 1985 on 25th October which involved just “a leased boeing 737 and an airbus 300 B4”. (emirates story, 2010)



How does the macro-economic environment impact on the firm’s international business performance?

June 17th, 2010 / 1 Comment » / by nastyrunner

How does the macro-economic environment impact on the firm’s international business performance? In your answer, you should focus on one macro-economic factor – eg. Economic, legal, political, or cultural. Examine the causal relationship between this factor and firm performance indicators.



Food Courts

June 17th, 2010 / No Comments » / by nastyrunner

Define

The Knowledge Village food court is going to be our point of measure. In this food court several food chains are available; such as KFC, Subway, Pizza Hut, Beirut, Fiesta and Pashman . The food court is made for everyone that works or studies in Knowledge Village. Therefore, the customers for these food chains are mainly students, teachers, and employees.

In the food court the main service provided is food. Although the quality of the food and the place is very poor the place still provides food and drinks for hundreds of customers daily because it is the only provider in this area.



Are Social Networking Sites a Risk for Marketers?

March 16th, 2010 / No Comments » / by nido

Are you one of the 400 million users that have a facebook account? What about twitter? Google Buzz? Well, being a self-proclaimed technology geek and my love for Social Networking Sites (SNS) has gotten me far in the online world.

Now I know what you’re thinking, is this going to be another one of the millions of compare and contrast articles you have already read online of the three social networking giants? Of course not!



McDonalds Case Study

September 18th, 2009 / 1 Comment » / by nastyrunner

Introduction
McDonald’s is the most famous and well-known fast-food company in the world. It was started by Dick and Mac McDonald’s in 1940. Their concept of the restaurant was based on speed and therefore called ‘Speedee Service System’ in 1948, which in today’s times is known as the fast food concept (Wikipedia, 2009). McDonald’s serves fast food to approximately 47 million people in more than 30,000 restaurants located in 121 countries (Bized, 2009). The product offering has chicken, beef, bread, milk, vegetables as the main ingredients which are composed into burgers (chicken, ham, beef, and vegetable), French fries, milk shakes, soft drinks, breakfast items, juices, and desserts. The major marketing moment for McDonald’s was provided by Ray Kroc, and the brand continues to be a major success by the hard work of its family of employees, suppliers, and franchisees. McDonald’s for years have continued with an extensive advertising campaign targeting children, healthy food, and convenience. The advertising is done through television, radio, newspaper, billboards & signage, sponsoring sport and charity events, many local events throughout the world.
?
Question 1 – Summarize the strategic situation confronting McDonald’s
In 1973 Richard Steinig (27 years) became a junior partner in McDonald’s Corp. Franchisee in his 2 stores that generates 80,000 in annual sale and earns 15% from the profit. But since 1999, sales haven’t budged, but instead costs kept rising. (McDonald’s began advertising the Big N’ Tasty burger). Instead of living the American Dream, Steinig says: ‘The business just isn’t nearly as profitable, I don’t think that McDonald’s has the waiting list it used to, and part of that reason is that the return on investment just isn’t what it used to be’.
Prospective franchisee were once eager to get into the 2 year training program by waiting in line for hours, but no line exists today, and the current franchisee start to feels alienated. The problem of McDonald’s is beyond cleaning up restaurant, but by facing rapidly fragmented market, and by fast growing restaurant called “Fast Casual” segment like Cosi & Quinzo.
Immigrant made exotic food like sushi, barrios. Some quick meals of all sort can be found in supermarket, convenience store, vending machine.
The Mickey D’s heyday didn’t help, 194 franchisees left the system, with 69 restaurants forced out for poor performance, the other 25 left seeking greener territory. McDonald’s buys back franchises if they cannot be sold. Opening a McDonald’s franchise costs $500,000 to $800,000. McDonald’s would rent them the location and demand high corporate standards and in return, franchisees could become very rich. But many franchisees says that ownership of a McDonald’s restaurant is no longer the reliable cash cow it once was. In the past, franchisees who beat McDonald’s national sales average were typically rewarded with the chance to open or buy more stores.
McDonald’s gave millions of Americans their first jobs, and has long symbolized to some people the American way of eating, it is now struggling with an identity crisis. Even though it is still the nation’s most visited fast-food (more than 20 million people eat at McDonald), the company is facing a decline in its portion of the fast-food market and in the estimation of many of its customers,
Jack M. Greenberg (60 years) introduce 40 menu items that creates no differences, instead he let the burger business deteriorate. Surveys shows delay in service & quality compare of those of rivals. Back in the 90’s McDonald’s had done so well in capturing market share through their growth and perception of cleanliness and service
The solution was to bring back James R. Cantalupo (59 years) who saw in the 80’s & 90’s the international success. But unfortunately McDonald’s recorded its first quarterly loss in the company 47 years history as a publicly traded business. Cantalupo & his team which included Charles Bell (42 years) and Mats Lederhausen (39 years), had plan to concentrate on getting service & quality right, by introducing “Up or Out” grading system. Cantalupo is enforcing a “tough love” program, where McDonald’s is getting rid of the weakest franchises. And the owners that flunk the rating and inspection system will get a chance to clean up their act, but if they don’t improve themselves they’ll be fired.
Since McDonald’s is living through the death of the mass market, Cantalupo had cut sales growth from 15% to 2 % annually, and added only 250 outlet in U.S., and 30 % less new opening in Europe, including closing 176 stores from 2800 in Japan. Some McDonald’s outlets are trying to draw more customers with improved services and products (some greets customers and opens the door for them, others built a resemblance to a French cafe, with a chef who makes custom panini sandwiches).
McDonald’s receives funds from its franchises in two ways. There is monthly service fee that varies but most recently in 2002 was 4 percent of total monthly sales. Another manner in which McDonald’s receives funds from its franchises is in rent money. McDonald’s owns all property in which a McDonald’s outlet was built regardless if the location is a franchise or company owned. It is estimated that McDonald’s generates more money from its rent than from its franchise fees. Investors have accepted that the growth day are over, they remain happily settled for a steady dividends.
Many of McDonald’s franchisees have voiced disappointment with lower profits, expensive new cooking systems, and stressed relations with management. Now franchisees are jumping to rivals, like Paul Saber who was a franchisee of McDonald’s for 17 years, then has sold back his 14 restaurant when he realized that the eating habits is shifting and open Panera Brad Co. (in 2008, a Health Magazine study, judged Panera Bread the America’s most healthy fast food restaurant).
Now franchisees are jumping to rivals, like Paul Saber who was a franchisee of McDonald’s for 17 years, then has sold back his 14 restaurant when he realized that the eating habits is shifting and open Panera Brad Co. (in 2008, a Health Magazine study, judged Panera Bread the America’s most healthy fast food restaurant). Made For You was developed with computer software that gives operators the ability to anticipate orders based on sales volumes during peak periods, according to McDonald’s Corp. spokeswoman Anna Rozenich.
So along with the entire hamburger category, the company has been losing market share to what the food industry calls the fast-casual restaurants like Panera Bread, Baja Fresh, Pret A Manger and Chipotle Grill (McDonald’s has an ownership stake in the last two) that have successfully domesticated exotic tastes for the mass audience.
“We have a new growth strategy,” said Charlie Bell, McDonald’s president and chief operating officer. “We will grow by adding more customers to our existing restaurants … not restaurants to customers. So that means our two top priorities are operational excellence and leadership marketing.” 2003 could be more challenging for McDonald’s once it gets past the initial sales boost it has experienced recently from its two major production launches — the salads and the McGriddle sandwich.
After months of sales declines, McDonald’s has begun to bounce back, recently reporting a 1.3-percent increase in U.S. same-store sales in April followed by a 63-percent jump in May, which reflects the domestic market’s best performance in four years. Wall Street applauded McDonald’s for its US. resurgence, but some restaurant analysts noted that the company faces an uphill climb as the chain’s overseas markets continue to post negative comparable-restaurant sales.
Uncomfortable points for franchisees is the top-down manner
1. fix pricing & menu problems
2. “made for you” kitchen upgrades in each restaurant
3. supposed to speed up orders & contain menu items
Irwin Kruger, a veteran McDonald’s franchisee with six stores in Manhattan, has customized the hamburger chain’s Made For You cooking system for his high-volume urban restaurants that operate without drive-thrus.
2003 could be more challenging for McDonald’s once it gets past the initial sales boost it has experienced recently from its two major production launches — the salads and the McGriddle sandwich.”I have got to make sure that I’m not turning off a customer because I can’t deliver the service he or she wants,” said Kruger, who was involved in the development of Made For You. “I don’t see anything wrong with a small buffer at peak lunch hours.”
Greenberg insisted, however, that the majority of front-counter slowdowns are unrelated to Made For You, but instead are caused by inadequate staffing levels, which can lead to such problems as fry stations not being properly manned
Kruger said one benefit of Made For You is that it has reduced food waste by 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent in his stores. He also emphasized that McDonald’s food quality has improved through such enhancements as toasted sandwich buns and the universal holding cabinets that keep all meat products hot until the sandwich is assembled.
Other service improvements Kruger has implemented in his restaurants include a designated traffic director, or “outside order taker,” who stands on the customer side of the counter and facilitates the ordering process.
McDonald’s has promised an expanded menu before, but it has not had a blockbuster new product since the Chicken McNugget, which was introduced in 1983. Other attempts to diversify their hamburger offerings, like the McLean sandwich and the Arch Deluxe, have all gone to their respective McGraves.
This situation is a result of several aspects that include an increase in competition, poor management, bad marketing and lack of response to the changes in the needs of franchises and customers. One reason for this is a high employee turnover rate. McDonald’s has the highest employee turnover rate among its competitors. Another contributing aspect to the poor customer service is slow service at the drive-through window
McDonald’s is struggling to overcome the longtime image problems stemming from its food and customer service, and wants to cultivate a cool reputation so it launched its first worldwide campaign “I’m lovin’ it.”, which was a key component of its massive revitalization program, and that replaced the “We love to see you smile”.



Marketing Strategy – Motorola

August 17th, 2009 / 3 Comments » / by nastyrunner

Introduction and Background Analysis



Failure of New Coke – Essay

August 17th, 2009 / Comments Off / by nastyrunner

Introduction
According to the American Marketing Association, brand is a form of representation of the consumer experience with a certain product or service and often refers to logo, name, and slogan. The factors influencing branding are the expectations of the consumer, design and product packaging, advertising, public relation, etc. (AMA, 1995). Traditionally, people considered marketing and salesmanship as the most important criteria for a successful business, but in today’s world, it is very important to develop and enhance the brand or else the product will be considered as a commodity. Branding is an integral part of Marketing Strategy as it creates an image in the minds of the people who are in direct and indirect contact with the product, for example, clients, employees, vendors, shareholders, etc. Successful branding can help in delivering the message of the company clearly, enhances credibility, motivates the buyer, builds brand loyalty of the user, and creates an attachment with the target audience. Organizations perform market research to measure the various aspects of their current products and new upcoming products. Similarly, they should perform brand research to understand how their customers perceive the brand, the reasons for differentiation from its competitors, and various other factors related to a brand. It helps in identifying the reasons the consumers prefer the brand over its competitors and the level of brand loyalty present in the mind of the consumers. So if market research helps in determining the price elasticity of a product, brand research helps in judging if a premium price can be charged for the product (Benson, 2009). Brand Research can be done in situations when a new company and a new brand is launched, existing company and to check brand elasticity, when two companies are merging then the two merging brands are measured, and when the company is revitalizing the brand needs to be rejuvenated.
About the Brand
Coca Cola as a brand is one of the most recognized brands in the world. Before organizing any advertisement, promotional strategy, public relation event, or any other form of media event, Coca Cola undergoes various processes of understanding their consumers and tailor their event accordingly. An extensive market research is conducted which includes surveys, focus groups, in-depth interviews, online forums and blogs, and any other form of obtaining information which helps in knowing the consumer. Creating marketing campaigns tailored to the life of its consumers has made Coca Cola a successful brand and increased brand loyalty. But in 1985, Coca Cola was responsible for one of the most disastrous blunders in marketing, also known as the ‘Coke Fiasco’, by introducing a new product called New Coke.
The rivalry between Coca Cola and Pepsi has been going on even before the introduction of New Coke. Since 1960’s Coca Cola’s market share has been same, whereas the market share of Pepsi was increasing steadily. It later on repositioned itself as the brand of youth which turned out to be really successful. In places where consumers were free to choose their type of cola drink to purchase like supermarkets, convenience stores, etc, Pepsi won the battle, whereas in places with restriction of choice like restaurants, clubs, etc, Coke was winning the battle as it already existed in those markets. This declined the market share of Coke from 60% after World War 2 to 24% in 1983 (Mikkelson, 2007). Moreover, in 1982 Diet Coke was launched without considering segmentation, and it was liked by everyone. By 1984, it reached rank 3 after Coca Cola and Pepsi in terms of liking. Pepsi introduced the Pepsi Challenge where the consumers were blind tasted between Coca Cola and Pepsi and everyone preferred the taste of Pepsi. Since, the market share of Pepsi was constantly increasing, it was important for Coca Cola to react (Cashberry, 2006). Considering all the factors, it was concluded that the taste was the major factor behind the success of Pepsi, and also Diet Coke as it tasted similar to its rival and not to its parent drink. Therefore, in 1985 Coca Cola introduced a new product called New Coke retiring the old one as they did not want the effect of cannibalization. Immediately after the launch, people revolted against the New Coke. Coca Cola was considered as an integral part of the Americans life and it was considered as a part of their identity. The company had under estimated the number of consumers shifting from the old Coke to the new one. According to Michael Ross, majority compared the change of Coke to stomping the American flag (Ross, 2005). Coca Cola received more than 40,000 letters of complaint and more than 6,000 calls daily on its toll free number. Consumers started buying the old Coca Cola on the shelf in bulk, and even started selling it for hiked up prices (Building Brands, 2009). After 87 days, the company reintroduced the old formula by calling it the Classic Coke. People forgave the mistake of the company and in the end of 1985; surveys showed that Pepsi was the leader in the competition. But due to this fiasco, Classic Coke gained a lot of popularity and out sold New Coke and even Pepsi and helped in regaining the number one rank. People who liked the New Coke bought the Diet Coke as it was similar and New Coke was abandoned. The market share of New Coke reduced from 3% to 0.1%.
Reasons for Failure
The launch of the New Coke was not a hasty decision. Coca Cola performed market research for a period of two years and spent an enormous amount of $4 million to compare the taste of New Coke versus Pepsi and old Coke. After performing 200,000 blind taste tests, it was concluded that people preferred the taste of New Coke over any other available beverage. Therefore, New Coke was given a new packaging and launched in the market with a bang and they discontinued the old Coke. Even though the introduction was carefully studied and many right steps were taken like reacting at the right time for a market change when the market share was decreasing, best research and development team was chosen to prepare the best flavor and packaging design which is appealing to the masses, no monetary compromises were done in terms of market research and the marketing campaign to launch the new product. But did it fail because of lack of enough research or misinterpreting the research result? During the press conference of the launch, New Coke was introduced but the reason for doing so was not declared. They never mentioned the reasons for change, that is, Pepsi Challenge and the other tests done by their research and development department which proved that the taste of the Coke was the reason it was losing its market share. During the blind taste test, people just take a sip of the cola and prefer a sweeter taste. But in reality they buy a can of 330 ml and they preferred the less sweet taste of old Coke. During the taste test, they did not ask if the New Coke taste would be preferred in a 330 ml can or a whole glass. Also, it was revealed in some tests that it was the taste of new Coca Cola, but no information was provided related to the discontinuation of the old Coke. Since Diet Coke was launched during that time, people considered it to be another variant of the parent beverage. Therefore, due to the wrong framing of questions for market research, they yielded wrong results which proved to be fatal. Moreover, the new packaging isolated itself from its consumers. The association of the word new was related to Pepsi as it was comparatively new into the market and a brand of youth. The old Coke was considered a legacy and an integral part of the American culture. Therefore, the brand loyal consumers of Coke were finding it hard to associate the ‘new’ change with Coca Cola. Also, during focus groups the loyal Coke consumers said that if Coke was changed, they might stop drinking Coke completely, and this influenced the Focus Group in terms of peer pressure, and provided misleading results. Coca Cola had ignored the sentimental value which its loyal American consumers had towards the brand. During the overall launch of the product, Coca Cola had its complete focus on the product and neglected the emphasis on the brand. The promotional campaign was different when compared to its previous campaigns and it is very important to have consistency in terms of advertising and promotion strategy. Therefore, changing the strategy for the launch of New Coke was not accepted by the people. This was one of the only major changes they performed, and after that kept it same for more than a century. To make matters worse, Pepsi launched advertisements in New York Times and other publications stating that Pepsi had won the ‘cola war’ and has taken a lead due to the mistake made by Coca Cola. Coke did not react to this, as they were already pressurized by the consequences of the fiasco. After all the havoc, the old Coke was launched with the name of Classic Coca Cola, and it was widely accepted by the American population.
Lessons for Market Research
There are a lot of major lessons to be learned from the blunder caused by the Coca Cola marketing even though it turned out to be a positive impact on the company. Coca Cola did not perform a complete and thorough SWOT analysis to understand its position in the market. Before any major decision is taken in an organization, it is very important to perform a SWOT analysis as it will help in defining the objectives clearly. Since there was no problem with the brand and even the product, they should have devised their strategies in terms of increasing sales. They could use promotional strategies like bundling offers, special packaging for occasions, coupons, competitions, or free giveaways. Or they could work on the public relation by sponsoring more events, or any other form of publicity. Moreover, they should have worked on their opportunities to their advantage. Since the consumers were emotionally attached to the product, they should have launched marketing campaign reminding their consumers the emotional attachment with the product and recall their memory. Coca Cola did not interpret its customers, their needs, and expectations from the company. It is very important to perform a brand research along with market research as it provides an insight of what people perceive the brand as. It is important to focus on the product as it should be according to the consumers liking, but at the same time, there should be equal focus to brand management. And depending on the information, marketing campaign is launched which will motivate the customers and decide the fate of the product. Moreover, conducting market research includes much more than conducting surveys, in-depth interviews, focus groups, etc. It involves collecting data, analyzing information, inferring result, and finally organizing the result which can provide easy understanding insights of the whole problem. It should be done carefully as minor mistakes like not revealing important information or asking questions in detail can cause misleading results.



Twitter

August 13th, 2009 / No Comments » / by nido

So I just signed up for a twitter account because I’m extremely bored and don’t have much to do here in Lebanon. Unfortunately for me, most of my friends are in Dubai and the ones who are here in Lebanon are at the end of the world so I don’t really get to do anything but to either stay at home or go out with my family!



SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
 
PROTECT YOUR FAMILY GET QUOTE
Mortgage Quote
Insurance
BuyToLet Mortgage
Visit Now